Today Lee wanted us in for a 'AVC Refresher' session. He quickly looked at out video from our Live Project (but none of the other team's which was a shame as I wanted to see their final versions) and nit picked at our shots and framing. While some of it was useful, it wasn't anything we already knew. We did all the framing for a reason, whether it told the narrative or just looked nice.
He then told us the basics of the AVC's again and what format to record (this was probably the only useful thing as the frame rates in ours was weird due to the camera ops not checking this on set). I have already made notes on all of this the last tech dem so check out this post and this one.
Lee then told us to do a tech dem and repeat what he just said in a 5 min video in groups of 3 or 4. Me, Beth, Janice and Jamie were in a group and we all wanted it out the way so we could focus on Professional Studies and our pitches for next week. So we quickly booked out a camera and recorded it on my phone.
Our tech dem is just pretty much a repeat of the one we did in Digital Production but without the swanky cuts and the display on the interactive whiteboard. We did think about doing a rap but we just didn't have the time.
I was the person improvising and pointing at buttons as I was the most confident with the equipment and know where everything is and the most confident in front of the camera. Janice was camera op. Beth was producer. Jamie and Beth are editing it. Even though we did use in camera editing, it still would be good to edit it as it is 7 minutes as I "um" and "ah" a lot.
Jamie's Edit
Beth's Edit
Monday, 7 March 2016
Saturday, 5 March 2016
Digital Production - Conclusion
I was not very enthusiastic about this project but I still like to think I did a good job as producer and camera op. I got a few variations of shots. However, I got marked down for my pan of the screenwriting lesson/seminar room due to strobing. However, I got fast and slow shots of this and different speeds. The editor included this version and I didn't realise. I am not very happy. I was also told to extend my paperwork beyond just risk assessments and agreements. Not quite sure what else needed to be done? I was also told I needed to chase down more footage (I tried to get Adam (graduate) in for an interview but he was busy) and I wasn't quite sure what else to get and what the director wanted! He said he was happy.
Looking at it back, it looks very wordy. I lost interest because of this. However I do like the interviews.
Looking at it back, it looks very wordy. I lost interest because of this. However I do like the interviews.
Friday, 4 March 2016
High Rise Q and A Tour
Today me and my friend Melody went to Leeds to see High Rise before it's release and also a question and answer session afterwards from the director, Ben Wheatley. I have went to this cinema before and I really love it with it's comfy sofas and the fact you can order pizza and wine while you are watching the film.
There was a few adverts before the film (mostly superhero movies) then followed by an intro from Chris Cooke (co-director of Mayhem Film Festival) and Ben Wheatley. He then said they had a significantly less budget than the adverts we just saw and to enjoy and stick around for the Q and A where we could get a limited edition shirt if we ask a question, but not "can I have a t shirt?". So that was my question out the window! I did have one in mind though.
https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/473792823278101505/
I was very excited to see the film itself as I keep linking it on here as a case study and this whole adventure is key experience for me; I am face to face with a real famous director. High Rise was very dark and gritty and a perfect representation of the 80s. There was some hilarious moments ("I'm an orthodontist, not a homosexual" being my favourite line) and some weird remixes of ABBA. Tom Hiddleston's performance was amazing and well acted, one scene between him and another actor had no words but you could tell what was being said/conveyed through facial expressions. Some symbolism was lost on me (I was going to ask the relevance of 'Little Bo Peep' but my other question was more important) and at times there was very little progression of plot and some ambivalent scenes. But overall it is a very clever film.
6/10
Me and my friend luckily got front row tickets, right in the middle, so it was great for the question and answer session afterwards (not so much for the film as our necks were aching). We were bound to be noticed! While watching the credits roll, I also noticed Ben Wheatley edited and wrote the film which I found interesting.
Q&A Leeds Everyman. A great end to a great week. Thanks Nottingham Sheffield and Leeds :) #highrise pic.twitter.com/WTjQlE5XqZ— mr_wheatley (@mr_wheatley) March 4, 2016
Chris Cooke then asked a few questions to start and give us some ideas for questions and discussions. What I found interesting is how they pre-produced the film. Usually it's a highly collaborative process but Amy Jump (co-writer) was very secretive of the screenplay and wrote it entirely, then discussed it. She is still secretive now and refuses to answer or go to any question and answers. Amy gets the final say as writer and also helped edited it as they both tell a story. They then briefly talked about Thatcher's influence of the film (with the quote at the end) and how The Iron Lady is "the best sci-fi film" he has seen.
Production design was also a key, if not the main, feature of the film. The 70s set dress and costume made us think if it was a 70s or a modern film with it's themes covered that are very relevant today. Wheatley then said that the book was sci-fi and the film is period. He portrays the "70s that never existed". The actual high rise building was made to look like a hand and was also made to look feasable; where would you but the balconies?, where would you out the camera? The shopping scene was also made from scratch with made up brands and logos. He wanted to create an "alternate reality".
https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/movie%3A-high-rise
It was also interesting to find out that the project had multiple directors but kept dropping out, but they left their ideas behind as it was "their creativity". They also edited the film in their own house and away from human influence which is challenging normal conventions where they are open for feedback. They had a vision in mind and nothing was going to change it. The psychedelic montages of the film was described by Wheatley as a "fungus" with key images planted in them. They started editing during production with these key images. They also had no legal control over production.
The main character was more human than usual protagonists; he made mistakes and is a coward, which made the film more relatable. The dark themes of the film mirrors the book as Wheatley wanted to keep this theme as much as possible. Cooke then made a comment on the film being 'British' with the mannerisms to which Wheatley added "mannerisms and killing". So British. The cast was huge which was a big change for him, but he then stressed that famous doesn't matter, he looks for talent. Amy also had a say in casting and some faces in mind as she was still writing. There was also a few cameos of previous films he directed and that also had resemblance to their characters in both films, such as the corrupt police man from Kill List who was also corrupt in High Rise. He then said it was like the "Marvel universe" and wanted to join the dots.
The film also had a few visual influences but Wheatley said they weren't intentional as he didn't have time during production to think of this. As he was editing, he noticed a few influences. He then said that this was "not a shopping list, it is a emulsh of cinema". He then briefly talked about influences when he was little, comic books being the main one with narratives being told visually and also how they are non linear. The one thing he regretted about High Rise was the budget. One key feature of the book was the fact that a dog had two back legs missing so the character made prosthetics for the dog. But this would cost £2,000 so they put a blanket over the dog instead.
Wheatley is a busy man and is constantly flitting between projects. He then briefly talked about his episode in Doctor Who; he wanted to do this so he could make something that his son could watch. He was also excited to hear that Loki was going to be in Dad's next feature. Wheatley also has another film coming out later this year called Free Fire.
I met Ben Wheatley afterwards!!
One person in the audience asked how much time he got with the actors due to the busy schedule (7 weeks production and to get everything filmed). They shot it non linear- Luke Evans' first day was him in a pool covered in blood. Most of the film was long one shots. He also said that if the performance the actors gave came across as awkward, it was his fault. He wanted natural acting and most of the dialogue was improvised. Tom Hiddleston, he said, was a pleasure to work with and "just does it" [what you ask him to]. The camera swings to keep up with the dialogue. He gave the actors an atmosphere where they can't fail and with no stress- he gave little direction as he wanted natural reactions. He then gave some interesting advice saying that "direction is the first thing a character says. The rest doesn't matter", kind of when someone gives directions and you listen to the first thing said "turn left" and not "just past the roundabout with the sheep on top".
He then talked about advice for budding directors (this was my question) one key piece of advice he gave was STORYBOARD EVERYTHING! He also then said that you don't need permission to film anything but he did need a risk assessment when the kid went up the ladder on the side of the building, but they got around this by lying it on the ground just like the old Batman's. He then said to not bother with a short film and do a full feature instead (go big or go home). For writing inspiration, look where you are while writing (at a desk, on a bench...) and start from there. Settings do not matter; they are minimal. It's the drama that matters. Then he said (he really liked my question!) to not fall into the trap of money. You don't need money to make a film; you can film anything on your phone nowadays.
I got a t shirt and badges for asking a question!
The dark humour of the script gave the film "life" according to Wheatley and more of a variety. The surrealistic nature of the film was also very realistic, with their focus on continuity and reasoning behind different props in a scene and how high the bin bags should be stacked, to also make is smooth while editing.
Thursday, 3 March 2016
LP1 - That's a Wrap!
Today we fine tuned editing and took Mike's advice he gave us yesterday on board and uploaded any last minute files to the VLE (evaluation, forms, etc). We tried everything Mike suggested to see what looked better and also colour corrected a lot of clips which made them look much better, such as the UV paints and Jess with the purple smoke. We also sadly cut out the big finish of the painting as the production values weren't there and looked a bit shabby. We put a shot of a vinyl player at the end instead so it was like a cyclical narrative. Our music video has been played back and exported. The only thing we couldn't get is the client's feedback since Dan could not get in this week.
I have just watched this back and there is a small thing really annoying me!!!! Noooo! At 2:38 it jump cuts and Jess reaches down twice! It's too late to change anything now but it is really annoying me. :-( I still love the video and I am proud of all our efforts.
I have just watched this back and there is a small thing really annoying me!!!! Noooo! At 2:38 it jump cuts and Jess reaches down twice! It's too late to change anything now but it is really annoying me. :-( I still love the video and I am proud of all our efforts.
Tuesday, 1 March 2016
Cultures of Youth II
Today in Malcolm's lecture, we looked at Material Culture as Sub-Cultural Identity (1975-2015). Starting where we last off last week, the Punk movement was made to shock and to create anarchy. Vivienne Westwood's shop 'Sex' did exactly this. Free love was a huge factor of this time and still is today.
The disco movement also started in the 70s and 80s with films such as Saturday Night Fever and Fame. Fame also introduced the gym aesthetic and fashion (which also inspired out live project).
The disco movement also started in the 70s and 80s with films such as Saturday Night Fever and Fame. Fame also introduced the gym aesthetic and fashion (which also inspired out live project).
https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/saturday-night-fever-gif
The lase 1980s were bleak with lots of concrete. The music videos echoed this, especially with John Foxx's Underpass. Foxx seems very enthusiastic and excited about underpasses in this video. Seems legit.
http://giphy.com/gifs/john-foxx-underpass-DMrCUGjtpTW0w
Key events: Thatcher elected, The Royal Wedding, Faukland's War.
The term of 'yuppies' were also introduced and youths had cash to spend on luxuries. Free sex and AIDS were also huge in the 80s and a key event.
Tribal belonging started to be introduced and were made to break stereotypes but also fit in (makes sense). There were three main types: New Romantics, Androgyny and Goth. The goth movement is probably the only group that has survived today. New Romantics I love. Love their style and I was brought up to like their style and music (especially Adam Ant who I still love today).
https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/adam-ant-gif
Rap and Hip Hop were also huge and gave black culture a voice (which was worrying at the time). NWA were one of the biggest groups with their name causing controversy (Niggas With Attitude), making people think that what is unacceptable is acceptable. We listened to Straight Outta Compton which seemed to be Brad's jam and was rapping along which amused us.
1990s music was a bit of all sorts: grunge, britpop, boybands... There was something for everyone and people started to fit in. There was also pre-Millennium tension with people thinking about the end of the world and technology. People thought that computers an the electric would crash as the date would change to 00.00.00 and they wouldn't know what to do. Films also echoed this (Fight Club being a huge one).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/07/fight-club-trivia_n_6425568.html
Malcolm then briefly went over the last decade and summed up news events such as bombings and Obama being elected. He then had a rant about Kim Kardashian ("whatever that is"). The big question is youth culture now normal?
LSD Live - Export
Turns out my export was 366gb full quality (it is half an hour long with cuts but I wasn't expecting it to be this big!) So I've had to scale it down using different export types on Avid (I also tried one online using a website called clipchamp.com).
The first one I exported on Avid managed to scale it down to 75gb but looked really squished. I then tried the website which took ages to scale down, but eventually it worked and was at 380mb. The video below is this video.
Me and Yiannis then had a look at different format options on Avid and managed to scale down the video as well as the quality. I feel bad for loosing the quality. I also thought of uploading it in parts in full quality but would have been very small parts and a full gig would be better. We managed to get this one down to 1.18gb which is better and is better quality than the clipchamp one.
Nope I got this wrong, turns out the clipchamp one is better quality and can be viewed in HD whereas the Avid one can't. My predictions were wrong. Don't understand how a 1gb one is better quality than a 300mb one but ah well.
The first one I exported on Avid managed to scale it down to 75gb but looked really squished. I then tried the website which took ages to scale down, but eventually it worked and was at 380mb. The video below is this video.
Me and Yiannis then had a look at different format options on Avid and managed to scale down the video as well as the quality. I feel bad for loosing the quality. I also thought of uploading it in parts in full quality but would have been very small parts and a full gig would be better. We managed to get this one down to 1.18gb which is better and is better quality than the clipchamp one.
Nope I got this wrong, turns out the clipchamp one is better quality and can be viewed in HD whereas the Avid one can't. My predictions were wrong. Don't understand how a 1gb one is better quality than a 300mb one but ah well.
Live Project 1 - Summary
We are now almost done! All we need to do is arrange a meeting of the client to set their approval of the video and any last minute changes, and production forms. Ideally I did want this done in pre-production stage but Janice was running around after roller derby's and locations. Even though we sadly didn't get a roller derby on board, Janice did an amazing job as producer and without her I don't know where we'd be.
I was cautious to not take over anyone's roles as this is my weakness according to the tutorial I had with Mike a few weeks ago. But when Diane said to do paperwork regardless of job roles, this confused me. I gave Ryan and Jack production logs and some forms to do since Janice was stressed out and running around for actor and location release forms. As team leader, I wanted to make sure everything is done but to not take over any roles and make sure everyone had something to do. I like to think I did a good job.
As a director I like to think I did well and directed the actors thoroughly and made them feel comfortable. I like to think I was also a good team leader to make sure everyone knew what they were doing and were clear in what I was asking them to do or for directing, how to act and what their objectives were (which I gave. I talk about this more in my evaluation and also in my Director Notes- blog post can be found here.)
I also like to think I did well in post production in the edit suites with Beth. We experimented with different clips and effects together and we work well as a team. Beth did say at one point to be more assertive and say if I want to take something out rather than just say "can we maybe try..." or some variation of this, which I will take on board. Beth is an amazing editor and spent long hard hours in the edit suites and I salute her enthusiasm.
Overall I am really proud of our team and we worked really well and effectively together and we have created a quality product at the end of it that we should all be proud of.
I also like to think I did well in post production in the edit suites with Beth. We experimented with different clips and effects together and we work well as a team. Beth did say at one point to be more assertive and say if I want to take something out rather than just say "can we maybe try..." or some variation of this, which I will take on board. Beth is an amazing editor and spent long hard hours in the edit suites and I salute her enthusiasm.
Group 4 was also a success and will hopefully give us a boost in marks and brownie points. It's something on top of the music videos to give to the client as a thank you and a keepsake. I was camera and editor for this and I am really happy with how it looks and I hope the client is too. The sound isn't amazing (more about this can be found here and here) but it wasn't my division. I had to work with what I had.
Overall I am really proud of our team and we worked really well and effectively together and we have created a quality product at the end of it that we should all be proud of.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















