Tuesday, 22 December 2015

Case Study: Fright Night

Fright Night (Tom Holland, 1985)

Budget: $9 mill
Box office: $24.9 mill
Distributor: Columbia Pictures
Accolades: Saturn Award for Best Horror, Supporting Actor, Writing
Rotten Tomatoes score: 91%


Fright Night (Craig Gillespie, 2011)

Budget: $30 mill
Box office: $41 mill
Distributor: Walt Disney Studios
Accolades: Fangoria Chainsaw Awards- Best Wide Release Film. IGN Best Horror Movie 2011.
Rotten Tomatoes score: 72%



Differences/Similarities 


  • Remake- Peter Vincent more sexualised
  • Original- more a romance
  • Remake- action straight away. We know it's a vampire/horror straight away. Gory-er?
  • Remake- brighter lighting. More Americanised? Establishing shots of LA.
  • Remake- find out people are missing with school absences. Original- news stories. Remake more school central- more a teen movie.
  • Remake- more music. Original more quiet and dramatic.
  • Remake- Ed not as annoying.
  • Remake- Jerry more muscular. Changing masculinity.
  • Remake- Ed jumps to the conclusion Jerry's a vampire. Original- Charley does. 
  • REMAKE- WHY DID ED STALK JERRY? HE COULDN'T HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN HE WAS A VAMPIRE. 
  • Original- Amy more sexualised. Remake- Amy more feminine in context. Changing femininity. Remake more sexually open (ish). Original raped by Jerry on camera. Original more darker?
  • Remake- new technology. Peter Vincent advert, phone app, LA skyscrapers. More SFX/green screen.
  • Remake- Jerry keeps victims alive. Darker?
  • Remake- Peter Vincent stage show. Original- TV show.
  • Remake- Peter Vincent alcohol and sex problem. Normal in original.
  • Remake- more action and fast cuts
  • Remake- club more sexualised and busy.

No comments:

Post a Comment